Compaq 6720s - Notebook PC Manuale Utente

Navigare online o scaricare Manuale Utente per Notebook Compaq 6720s - Notebook PC. Performance comparison of three notebook PCs with Intel and VIA Manuale Utente

  • Scaricare
  • Aggiungi ai miei manuali
  • Stampa
  • Pagina
    / 14
  • Indice
  • SEGNALIBRI
  • Valutato. / 5. Basato su recensioni clienti
Vedere la pagina 0
Performance comparison of three notebook
PCs with Intel and VIA processors
TEST REPORT
MAY 2008
Key findings
z The two Intel Celeron and Celeron M
processor-based systems performed better
on every test than the VIA C7-M processor-
based system, while costing $30 and $80
less.
z The Intel Celeron M 520 processor-based
system performed 204 percent to 471
percent better than the VIA C7-M processor-
based system in custom consumer
applications tests, while costing $80 less.
z The Intel Celeron 550 processor-based
system performed 303 percent to 621
percent better than the VIA C7-M processor-
based system in custom consumer
applications tests, while costing $30 less.
Executive summary
Intel Corporation (Intel) commissioned Principled
Technologies (PT) to run a set of performance tests on the
following notebook systems in their out-of-the-box (OOB)
configurations:
an HP 2133 Mini-Note PC with a VIA C7-M
1.20GHz processor-based system (which we refer
to as System A)
an HP 530 Notebook PC with an Intel Celeron M
520 1.60GHz processor-based system (which we
refer to as System B)
an HP Compaq 6720s Notebook PC with an Intel
Celeron 550 2.00GHz processor-based system
(which we refer to as System C)
Intel specified the test systems and provided the tests, test
procedures, and test settings. PT purchased the systems
from www.HP.com
, set up the systems, and executed all
tests. See Appendixes A and B for greater detail on the
systems.
We ran the following five custom consumer application tests that simulate tasks a typical user would perform:
Microsoft Office 2007 multitaskingone test that uses PowerPoint 2007 to print to an XPS file while at
the same time using Word 2007 to combine two documents.
Music ripping—one test that uses Apple iTunes 7.6 to rip a .wav music file to mp3 format
Photo editing—one test that automatically “smart fixes” a group of 50 digital photos using Adobe
Photoshop Elements 6.0
Spreadsheet recalculation—one test that uses Microsoft Office Excel 2007 to recalculate a spreadsheet
Video converting—one test that uses Videora iPod Converter to convert an .avi video file to a MPEG-4,
H.264 file
As the Key findings state, the two Intel Celeron and Celeron M processor-based systems performed better on
every test than the VIA C7-M processor-based system, while costing $30 and $80 less.
The Test results section provides greater detail about the Key findings above and the Test methodology section
explains how we ran the tests. Appendix A provides the price of the test systems and Appendix B details their
configurations.
Test results
Figure 1 presents the medians of all test scores for the systems. We ran each test five times and reported the
median of those runs. In an event of a tie, we chose the first chronological run. Lower scores are better, because
they represent the time, in seconds, that the system required to complete the test. A lower time indicates that the
system completed the work faster. The comparative ratings indicate how much faster System B or C is than
System A on each test.
Vedere la pagina 0
1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 13 14

Sommario

Pagina 1 - Test results

Performance comparison of three notebook PCs with Intel and VIA processors TEST REPORTMAY 2008 Key findings z The two Intel Celeron and Cel

Pagina 2 - Test methodology

10 Principled Technologies, Inc.: Performance comparison of three notebook PCs with Intel and VIA processors Appendix A – Test system price (not

Pagina 3

11 Principled Technologies, Inc.: Performance comparison of three notebook PCs with Intel and VIA processors Appendix B – Test system configurat

Pagina 4

12 Principled Technologies, Inc.: Performance comparison of three notebook PCs with Intel and VIA processors System HP 2133 Mini Notebook PC (Sy

Pagina 5

13 Principled Technologies, Inc.: Performance comparison of three notebook PCs with Intel and VIA processors System HP 2133 Mini Notebook PC (Sy

Pagina 6

14 Principled Technologies, Inc.: Performance comparison of three notebook PCs with Intel and VIA processors Disclaimer of Warranties; Limitati

Pagina 7

2 Principled Technologies, Inc.: Performance comparison of three notebook PCs with Intel and VIA processors Test Performance Results Comparativ

Pagina 8

3 Principled Technologies, Inc.: Performance comparison of three notebook PCs with Intel and VIA processors 4. At the Microsoft and Manufacture

Pagina 9

4 Principled Technologies, Inc.: Performance comparison of three notebook PCs with Intel and VIA processors Capturing an image of the hard drive

Pagina 10

5 Principled Technologies, Inc.: Performance comparison of three notebook PCs with Intel and VIA processors Photo editing test using Adobe Photo

Pagina 11

6 Principled Technologies, Inc.: Performance comparison of three notebook PCs with Intel and VIA processors We report the time, in seconds, that

Pagina 12

7 Principled Technologies, Inc.: Performance comparison of three notebook PCs with Intel and VIA processors 6. Right-click, and select Delete.

Pagina 13

8 Principled Technologies, Inc.: Performance comparison of three notebook PCs with Intel and VIA processors Microsoft Office 2007 Word Combine +

Pagina 14

9 Principled Technologies, Inc.: Performance comparison of three notebook PCs with Intel and VIA processors 3. When the PowerPoint print finish

Commenti su questo manuale

Nessun commento