Compaq 6720s - Notebook PC Manuale Utente Scaricare il pdf

Performance comparison of three notebook

PCs with Intel and VIA processors

TEST REPORT

MAY 2008

Key findings

z The two Intel Celeron and Celeron M

processor-based systems performed better

on every test than the VIA C7-M processor-

based system, while costing $30 and $80

less.

z The Intel Celeron M 520 processor-based

system performed 204 percent to 471

percent better than the VIA C7-M processor-

based system in custom consumer

applications tests, while costing $80 less.

z The Intel Celeron 550 processor-based

system performed 303 percent to 621

percent better than the VIA C7-M processor-

based system in custom consumer

applications tests, while costing $30 less.

Executive summary

Intel Corporation (Intel) commissioned Principled

Technologies (PT) to run a set of performance tests on the

following notebook systems in their out-of-the-box (OOB)

configurations:

• an HP 2133 Mini-Note PC with a VIA C7-M

1.20GHz processor-based system (which we refer

to as System A)

• an HP 530 Notebook PC with an Intel Celeron M

520 1.60GHz processor-based system (which we

refer to as System B)

• an HP Compaq 6720s Notebook PC with an Intel

Celeron 550 2.00GHz processor-based system

(which we refer to as System C)

Intel specified the test systems and provided the tests, test

procedures, and test settings. PT purchased the systems

from www.HP.com

, set up the systems, and executed all

tests. See Appendixes A and B for greater detail on the

systems.

We ran the following five custom consumer application tests that simulate tasks a typical user would perform:

• Microsoft Office 2007 multitasking—one test that uses PowerPoint 2007 to print to an XPS file while at

the same time using Word 2007 to combine two documents.

• Music ripping—one test that uses Apple iTunes 7.6 to rip a .wav music file to mp3 format

• Photo editing—one test that automatically “smart fixes” a group of 50 digital photos using Adobe

Photoshop Elements 6.0

• Spreadsheet recalculation—one test that uses Microsoft Office Excel 2007 to recalculate a spreadsheet

• Video converting—one test that uses Videora iPod Converter to convert an .avi video file to a MPEG-4,

H.264 file

As the Key findings state, the two Intel Celeron and Celeron M processor-based systems performed better on

every test than the VIA C7-M processor-based system, while costing $30 and $80 less.

The Test results section provides greater detail about the Key findings above and the Test methodology section

explains how we ran the tests. Appendix A provides the price of the test systems and Appendix B details their

configurations.

Test results

Figure 1 presents the medians of all test scores for the systems. We ran each test five times and reported the

median of those runs. In an event of a tie, we chose the first chronological run. Lower scores are better, because

they represent the time, in seconds, that the system required to complete the test. A lower time indicates that the

system completed the work faster. The comparative ratings indicate how much faster System B or C is than

System A on each test.

1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 13 14

Sommario

Pagina 1 - Test results

Performance comparison of three notebook PCs with Intel and VIA processors TEST REPORTMAY 2008 Key findings z The two Intel Celeron and Cel

Pagina 2 - Test methodology

10 Principled Technologies, Inc.: Performance comparison of three notebook PCs with Intel and VIA processors Appendix A – Test system price (not

Pagina 3

11 Principled Technologies, Inc.: Performance comparison of three notebook PCs with Intel and VIA processors Appendix B – Test system configurat

Pagina 4

12 Principled Technologies, Inc.: Performance comparison of three notebook PCs with Intel and VIA processors System HP 2133 Mini Notebook PC (Sy

Pagina 5

13 Principled Technologies, Inc.: Performance comparison of three notebook PCs with Intel and VIA processors System HP 2133 Mini Notebook PC (Sy

Pagina 6

14 Principled Technologies, Inc.: Performance comparison of three notebook PCs with Intel and VIA processors Disclaimer of Warranties; Limitati

Pagina 7

2 Principled Technologies, Inc.: Performance comparison of three notebook PCs with Intel and VIA processors Test Performance Results Comparativ

Pagina 8

3 Principled Technologies, Inc.: Performance comparison of three notebook PCs with Intel and VIA processors 4. At the Microsoft and Manufacture

Pagina 9

4 Principled Technologies, Inc.: Performance comparison of three notebook PCs with Intel and VIA processors Capturing an image of the hard drive

Pagina 10

5 Principled Technologies, Inc.: Performance comparison of three notebook PCs with Intel and VIA processors Photo editing test using Adobe Photo

Pagina 11

6 Principled Technologies, Inc.: Performance comparison of three notebook PCs with Intel and VIA processors We report the time, in seconds, that

Pagina 12

7 Principled Technologies, Inc.: Performance comparison of three notebook PCs with Intel and VIA processors 6. Right-click, and select Delete.

Pagina 13

8 Principled Technologies, Inc.: Performance comparison of three notebook PCs with Intel and VIA processors Microsoft Office 2007 Word Combine +

Pagina 14

9 Principled Technologies, Inc.: Performance comparison of three notebook PCs with Intel and VIA processors 3. When the PowerPoint print finish

Più documenti per Notebook Compaq 6720s - Notebook PC

Per vedere il documento Compaq 6720s - Notebook PC Manuale Utente

Compaq 6720s - Notebook PC Manuale Utente (29 pagine)

Per vedere il documento Compaq 6720s - Notebook PC Specifiche

Compaq 6720s - Notebook PC Specifiche (155 pagine)

Commenti su questo manuale

Nessun commento

Compaq 6720s - Notebook PC Manuale Utente

Navigare online o scaricare Manuale Utente per Notebook Compaq 6720s - Notebook PC. Performance comparison of three notebook PCs with Intel and VIA Manuale Utente

Sommario

Più documenti per Notebook Compaq 6720s - Notebook PC

Commenti su questo manuale

Prodotti e manuali riguardandi Notebook Compaq 6720s - Notebook PC